After all, most philosophy begins as bizarre and inaccessible. Difference and Repetition ( French: Différence et Répétition) is a 1968 book by philosopher Gilles Deleuze, originally published in France. Yes, there was a lot of bloviating. But I would like to talk about the effect of these incredibly challenging and alluring ideas that I've been ravenously consuming for the past couple of weeks while meeting in a reading group for this very book. Ultimate is the Spirit of Generosity, Getting Lit: An Aperitif and Round 1 with Steph Post, Alive and Writing: What Recent Memoirs Reveal about Illness and the State of Health Care, Where to Submit: September, October, and November 2020. I hope Hagen considers completing his slow-reading as a book, although it would probably have to be 1000-plus pages. Later in the week, you might read a different book by the same author and talk about the differences and similarities. certainly made the difference. The very distinction between repetition of the signifier and that of the signified implies difference at the heart of repetition, for when the signifier is repeated, the signified changes. Two commentators, in particular, helped me through the tome: Joe Hughes’s reader guide did a good job of contextualizing Deleuze’s arguments in relation to those of his predecessors- particularly Kant and Husserl. And that's what I love about Deleuze, he rarely beats anyone up rowdy style. Early Deleuze's eclectic style is put on display as he writes with ease through several competing discourses, synthesizing Freud, Spinoza, Marx, and Nieztsche as if they are all equally correct in their assertions. Repetition is the key for any learning. Later in his career he wrote some of the more infamous texts of the period, in particular, Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus. Repetition is a related term of repeat. touching my own hair now constantly. repetition . It's long. The persuasive power of repetition is one of the reasons it is so common. Example of Conforming: Steve Neale's Theory of Repetition & Difference Summary of Examples: What That Means: What He Said: Example of Subverting The Texas Chainsaw Massacre trailer shows conformation of horror convention as it is set in an abandoned house that has been inherited D&R is a fascinating, impossible work of authentic philosophy. and what's the difference? Every formula which implies their confusion is regrettable: for example, when we say that two things are as alike as two drops of water; or when we identify ‘there is only a science of the general’ with ‘there is only a science of that which is repeated’. Simply put, these two things, difference and repetition, have historically always been thought, starting from identity as the basis from which they can be determined. So the same in Derrida is a combination of identity and difference governed by a simultaneous repeatability … Antistasis. Scholars of Nietszche, Leibniz, Hegel, Kant et al. Not sure what rating to give this text. DESCRIPTION:Published nearly fifty years ago in the tumultuous year of 1968, Difference and Repetition is increasingly recognized as Deleuze’s primary magnum opus. Although more than 400 years old, it’s widely regarded as one of the best novels ever written. Ushering in a new era of deconstruction, and Irigaray style incomprehensible feminism. Repetition—the use of the same term several times—is one of the crucial elements in poetry. That encounter, if it is to be learning, should be a “clothed” repetition rather than the “repetition” undergone by a subjection to knowledge. and she dont like it, whites want to stay... Hello all! by Columbia University Press. Key to Difference and Repetition is the differential or splitting-away theory of the faculties. whites rule in the US. It's long. Welcome back. Not quite as interesting as Deleuze's Logic of Sense. It was translated into English by Paul Patton in 1994. Not quite as interesting as Deleuze's Logic of Sense. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Refresh and try again. For millennia thinkers have posited the eternal question: "Can we make philosophy even more inaccessible?" Deleuze is a key figure in postmodern French philosophy. Difference is introduced through the very fact of repetition: no pure repetition exists. Even more helpful was Benjamin D. Hagen’s wonderful blog, Sketching a Present, which offers a (very) slow reading of Difference and Repetition’s particularly impenetrable opening two sections. I'm not finished yet but I have a few observations. In its explication the work moves deftly between Hegel, Kierkegaard, Freud, Althusser, and Nietzsche to establish a fundamental critique of Western metaphysics. In order for a prop… He argued, then, that there is no good and evil, but rather only relationships which are beneficial or harmful to the particular individuals. Difference and Repetition serves as a revaluation of the way in which the multiplicity of forces in nature are categorized and evaluated. Genre Theory ‘Genres are instances of repetition and differences’ By Robson & Adrian 2. In other words, I have difference because I have something that is different from something which has been identically given, or, I have instances of repetition, because I am repeating things which we take to be identical in a cert. pure difference is when the x-rated version of iron man is simply called iron man. May 18th 1995 But I would like to talk about the effect of these incredibly challenging and alluring ideas that I've been ravenously consuming for the past couple of weeks while meeting in a reading group for this very book. We're a new online lit hub that focuses on sexuality and gender. Neale states that the film and it’s genre is defined by two things: How much is conforms to its genre’s individual conventions and stereotypes. Is "prefer" diction or repetition? It's kind of like pulling the rug out from under traditional philosophical thought (referred to wi. Reading this book has made me enthusiastic to read more Nietzsche, especially “Will to Power” and “Thus spoke Zarathustra”, even though I have read both books before. I am the founder and editor of Fig Wellness! It’s … Normally this confusion arises when dealing with Design of Experiments (DOE). The danger to avoid is construing this in … His overturning of traditional Western views of representation forever alters the landscape of any possible knowledge. Throughout the book, I recalled many times the posthumously released short film of Hans Richter “Everyday”, which is a made originally in 1929 featuring Eisenstein as a policeman. As a self-thought artist who was born deaf in a small village in Idaho, Castle was making drawings, collage, and assemblages entirely from found objects. It has all the answers, but you have to figure out the right questions to ask. ©2014-2020 The Accomplices LLC. This book contains the core of Deleuze's thought and is the most coherent and direct statement of his philosophical ideas which would later be put to use in his collaborations with Felix Guattari. Finally! Deleuze’s reading of Nietzsche is not anywhere close to my reading. Difficult book, but definitely a touchstone text within the Continental Tradition. Well, if you're looking for me to explain Deleuze for you, no. I have read Bergson before (Matter and Memory) and did understand the points that were brought into the classical discussion of pure difference and complex repetition. will find this work challenging and antagonizing. November 20, 2020. Nevertheless, it would be written another chapter so-called "Repetition in Itself". Reading this book has made me enthusiastic to read more Nietzsche, especially “Will to Power” and “Thus spoke Zarathustra”, even though I have read both books before. Notably, within his metaphysics he favored a Spinozian concept of a plane of immanence with everything a mode of one substance, and thus on the same level of existence. And the last chapter is actually still quite thought-provoking. Since the proverb means: [Doing something multiple times] is the mother of studies. Deleuze’s Eternal Problem: Difference and Repetition. Difference and Repetition offers us a resounding yes. Difference and Repetition was Deleuze's principal thesis for the Doctorat D'Etat alongside his secondary, historical thesis, Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza. There’s no way I could have gotten through it without a lot of help from commentaries and on-line synopsis. This seminar will be devoted to a close and careful reading of this work, paying particular attention to his critique of representation, as well as the prevailing ontologies premised on identity, his alternate […] This something is an object not of recognition but of a fundamental encounter.’, in place of a proper review, a note on difficulty: ronald bogue compares the structure of this book to that of a "topological puzzle"; deleuze himself puts it better, i think, in this book's description of differential ontology: "a labyrinth without a thread (Ariadne has hung herself)." Michel Foucault called Deleuze the major philosopher of our epoch...so...it's probably just me and not Deleuze... pretzels is the metaphysics of continuity. Perhaps his provocations only make sense against the background of a quasi-scholastic reverence for the classics. Deleuze's dense and vigorous attempt at providing the reader with a method of deduction towards several concepts each of which themself form a larger theoretical framework around Difference and Repetition (Repetition here being significantly tied to Deleuze's reading of Nietzsche and his Eternal Return), is notable not just for the ideas presented but furthermore for the potential that lies dormant within its pages and pages. What remains for us now of Hegel, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida and the "philosophy of difference"? There’s no way I could have gotten through it without a lot of help from commentaries and on-line synopsis. His overturning of traditional Western views. Yes, there was a lot of reliance on these just incredibly silly Freudian, Lacanian, and structuralist concepts. In his long awaited sequel to Being and Time, Deleuze takes what you loved about BT and just runs with it. Summary : A new edition of this introduction to Deleuze's seminal work, Difference and Repetition, with new material on intensity, science and action and new engagements with Bryant, Sauvagnargues, Smith, Somers-Hall and de Beistegui. Start by marking “Difference and Repetition” as Want to Read: Error rating book. The work is somewhat *repetitive, but solidifies originary difference as the starting point for any philosophy to come. difference and variation opposite of similarity and repetition, repeated motifs will rarely be exactly the same to keep things interesting, parallelism thus requires a degree of difference as well as striking similarity, can be very stark oppositions or less sharp and distinguished, How are elements contrasted and differentiated from one another? Also in terms of differences and affirmation, I kept thinking about work of James Castle. To see what your friends thought of this book. In a certain sense the central idea of Difference and Repetition can be summed up reasonably quickly. Difference and Repetition, a brilliant exposition of the critique of identity, has come to be considered a contemporary classic in philosophy and one of Deleuze's most original works. Finally! But what I have gotten out of. Repetition is the practice of doing something multiple times, often sufficiently more than once. It implies that one particular or term can be substituted for another, whereas repetition involves something that cannot be replaced, singularities which are nonexchangeable and nonsubstitutable—‘reflections, echoes, doubles and souls’ (1). Something in the world forces us to think. the image of thought), without a clear and stable relation to the true. It's kind of like pulling the rug out from under traditional philosophical thought (referred to within as the "Image of Thought,") or more accurately to say that there was never a rug or a floor underneath any of it to start with. Even more helpful was Benjamin D. Hagen’s wonderful blog, Sketching a Present, which offers a (very). It is a rhetorical technique to add emphasis, unity, and/or power. Is this diction or repetition in the paragraph below? Deleuze is a key figure in postmodern French philosophy. Infants. will find this work challenging and antagonizing. Difference and Repetition serves as a revaluation of the way in which the multiplicity of forces in nature are categorized and evaluated. The best that can be done is to attempt create concepts and ideas which synthesize constant, erratic flux. Th. Ushering in a new era of deconstruction, and Irigaray style incomprehensible feminism. I couldn't believe the affinities Deleuze finds with certain aspects of Platonic formalism. Introduction: Repetition and Difference. 2. What view is an autobiography written in? (1979), who find no Morph / Rep differences. Steve Neale states that genres all contain instances of repetition and difference, difference is essential to the to the economy of the genre. Head in the clouds critical theory at its best. ‘The conditions of a true critique and a true creation are the same: the destruction of an image of thought which presupposes itself and the genesis of the act of thinking in thought itself.