Probably you update that article some day with ‘smaller’ examples. While it’s hard to point out any structural differences between the characters, this image actually gives us our first major hint as to the difference between these two popular fonts: the second sample is somewhat heavier, almost as if it were a “Tahoma Medium” rather than a different font altogether. I recommend dropping Tahoma entirely. 06/10/2020; 2 minutes to read; In this article Overview. nice article, was a pleasure to read. The name "Verdana" is based on verdant (something green), and Ana (the name of Howlett's eldest … And there you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth. Verdana Pro shares all these advantages with the original Verdana, except for universal availability—people will have to buy it. Second is Tahoma. While that just about covers the difference between the characters of these two fonts, there’s one final piece of the puzzle left. Recovery disc for Windows 8 To this writer’s eye’s, Tahoma certainly has better aesthetics, and it has been continuously extended with a richer character set and more symbols, while Verdana has somewhat languished over the years. If you haven’t come across Georgia Pro before, you should take a look at it. Perhaps more importantly, the type hinting for Verdana seems somewhat lackluster, suggesting it may have been skipped over or given only the meagerest of attention from Microsoft’s typography division when it came to updating the fonts’ hinting to play nicer with ClearType and DirectWrite/Direct2D.Â And yet, some have a preference for the (extreme) bias towards legibility that Verdana presents, and given the right setting, it can certainly be a worthy choice. Here's our breakdown of the best fonts and worst fonts ever and why they're good (or bad). Just to name two fonts that designers love to hate. Verdana (in blue) with its characters scaled down to 93% of their initial width, superimposed atop of Tahoma (in orange). It depends very much on the rest of the site design. sign up. To illustrate just how similar these two fonts are, here’s the letter aÂ as it appears in both, superimposed atop of one another: The letter a in Tahoma and Verdana, superimposed. With the individual characters in the Verdana sample scaled down to 93% of their initial width, the only non-negligible difference between the two fonts is now their letter spacing: Verdana’s characters are spaced considerably farther apart than those of Tahoma. Here are two lines of text, one in each of the two fonts in question: Aside from the appalling hinting obvious in the second line,2 there are some uncanny likenesses between the two. Tahoma in 8 looks good, Tahoma in 9 looks -in my opinion- quite strange, not as good readableas Tahome 8. Read this sample of Verdana vs. Helvetica: Here’s the same text used very small. I would like to read your opinion. Arial is fundamentally a bastardisation of Helvetica, which was designed in 1957 for print and signage. The Verdana fonts were created specifically to address the challenges of on-screen display. The answer to that question can be found in this Typophile column titledGeorgia & Verdana: Typefaces designed for the screen (finally) by Daniel Will-Harris,6 who interviewed Simon Earnshaw, then a typographer working at Microsoft: The Verdana family started in early Summer 94 as a two font typeface (Tahoma), designed by Matthew Carter and hinted by Tom Rickner, to be used as a system font for Windows 95. Tahoma is wider than Verdana. If you're a designer it's crucial to know what the best and worst typefaces are. Your score is 0. So between these two fonts, which should you use? Here we can see the final difference between the characters in these two fonts: Tahoma’s characters are drawn with a shade smaller counters when compared to their Verdana counterparts.